Friday, 22 May 2015

Have the changes to the manner in which the Faithful receive the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament assisted the Faithful in their understanding of, and active participation in, the mystery, beauty and essential purposes of the Holy Mass?

There's a good article over at Crisis Magazine. It relates to the Church in the USA but what is says about taking stock from within is just as relevant over here in the UK. There are many things going on in society around us that we have very little possibility of influencing but we can focus on building up our spirituality and depth of Christian life to make us stronger for the conflicts with the world. But sometimes its easier to carp at the world from the sidelines than getting down to the harder task of tackling our own failings.

Here's a taste of the article with my own highlights but do go and read the whole article.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the close of the Second Vatican Council. Pope Francis has decided to mark the occasion with the “Year of Mercy.” Despite much happy-talk and positive papal press, it is a time of foreboding in the Church...

It seems an apt time, therefore, for the  Conference of Bishops to take stock of the state of affairs ad intra Eccelsiam. By clearly examining the health of the inner life of the Church, the bishops can lay a better foundation for dealing with the challenges from the outside.

Of particular concern these fifty years after the Council ought to be the changes made to the liturgy in the late 1960s and 1970s, implemented by, and under the authority of, the bishops’ conferences. And the most fundamental of these changes relates to the manner of reception of Holy Communion at Mass, whereby the vast majority of today’s communicants receive Communion in the hand while standing.

In reviewing the challenges both inside and outside the Church, based upon several decades of experience, the bishops must ask themselves a simple, profound and concrete question: Have the changes to the manner in which the Faithful receive the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament assisted the Faithful in their understanding of, and active participation in, the mystery, beauty and essential purposes of the Holy Mass?

Reception of Holy Communion in the Hand
Today, the practice of receipt of Holy Communion at Mass in the hand is extremely widespread. Like other changes that followed the Council, many Catholics incorrectly associate this manner of reception with the “reforms” of Vatican II. In truth, the Council gave no permission to allow the Faithful to receive the Blessed Sacrament by hand, nor was it made part of the rubrics for the Novus Ordo missal of 1969.

The movement to permit this manner of reception grew in force after the close of the Council. The idea, it seems, was based on a kind of antiquarianism that associated reception in the hand with the practice of the early Church. It was also part of the effort to promote the understanding of the Mass as a community meal over the conception of the Mass as primarily a Holy Sacrifice.

It seems apparent, however, that these lofty concepts were hardly embraced or understood by the vast majority of the laity. For his part, Pope Paul VI perceived significant dangers in allowing for the practice. Responding to the pleas of a minority of progressive European bishops (sound familiar?) to permit in-hand reception, in May 1969, the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship declared that “the Holy Father has decided not to change the existing way [via the tongue] of administering holy communion to the faithful.” (See Memoriale Domini at para. 11.)

The Holy See apprehended the gravity of permitting a change in the solemn manner of the reception of the Blessed Sacrament. It recognized that the proposed change “carries certain dangers with it which may arise from the new manner of administering holy communion: the danger of a loss of reverence for the august sacrament of the altar, of profanation, of adulterating the true doctrine.” (See Id. para. 10.) By a two-to-one margin, the bishops worldwide voted in support of the position of the Holy Father.

Nonetheless, in the typical fashion of the times, the pope undercut his own declaration by allowing the various bishops’ conferences the right to permit Communion in the hand in their respective territories via a secret, two-thirds majority vote of the bodies. (See Id. at para. 11-12.)

Reception of Holy Communion While Standing
The practice of receiving the Blessed Sacrament while standing proceeded the limited permission for in-hand reception.

In 1967, the Sacred Congregation of Rites promulgated Eucharisticum Mysterium, wherein the Holy See declared that the Faithful may receive the Blessed Sacrament either standing or kneeling.

The Current State of Affairs
According to a 2013 study performed for Georgetown’s Center for Applied Research on the Apostolate, only 63 percent of U.S. Catholics believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Nearly 1 in 5 believers in the Real Presence apparently hold to the belief without an awareness that it is taught by the Church. And of course well-over a third of Catholics do not believe at all in the Real Presence.

It is not here necessary to rehash other statistical information on the decline of American Catholicism following the Council and the changes to the Mass, such as the sharp drops in Mass attendance and vocations. While the experience of the last 50 years has not been uniformly negative, the tendency of the hierarchy to trumpet the “springtime of renewal” is a sad joke.

Furthermore, as the digital pages of this publication and so many other highlight daily, the American Church is increasingly isolated in a culture that is under constant, and effective, assault from an aggressive secularist, modernist ideology. Many American bishops have courageously and articulately proclaimed and defended the Church’s teachings on life, marriage and religious liberty, and yet, especially with marriage, there is a sense that the Church is rapidly losing ground and is, essentially, ignored.

In sum, we are not properly catechizing ad intra or ad extra Eccelsiam. The reasons for the problem are many, but at the core, the problem stems from our diminished liturgy, the diminishment of which is highlighted by the manner in which the Faithful receive Corpus Christi. Since, as the Council proclaimed in Sacrosanctum Concilium, the liturgy is the “summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed” and is also “the font from which her power flows,” we must first graft the spiritual life of the Faithful wholly onto the liturgy before we can hope to broadly evangelize inside and outside the Church. And reverence before the Eucharist is the heart of liturgical spirituality.

As has always been the case, the Mass is the greatest tool for teaching and handing on the Faith. The Church need not convert the entire body of believers into Thomistic scholars in order for the Faithful to fully understand and embrace the True Presence.

In a simple and profound way, the faithful can learn this truth merely through the reverent reception of the Blessed Sacrament and by observing the way in which we treat the Sacred Species. Its reception should be done in a manner that is unlike any other experienced in daily life.

In deep reverence, we come to Communion on our knees. Nothing else given to us requires us to kneel down in awe and respect.

We do not touch it, as we would any other object someone might give to us, for it alone is too holy.

We receive it with a paten under our chins, lest even a crumb fall to the ground. No other food is so honored.

Finally, it is essential for the episcopacy to be mindful of the geneses of Communion in the hand and the standing posture. Neither is the work of the Council. Sacrosanctum Concilium says nothing regarding a change in the manner of the reception of Holy Communion.

Neither is mentioned in the rubrics of the Novus Ordo; even the substantial changes instituted in the “Mass of Paul VI” gave no directive for these practices.

Indeed, Blessed Paul VI himself, the pope of the Council, refused to endorse in-hand reception and strongly counseled against it.

Thus, there is no reason given by the magisterium to retain these practices. Whatever abstract or academic notions prompted their adoption, the experience of the Church in the decades since shows that the underlying theology of the changes did nothing to catechize the faithful and enhance their devotion to the sacred liturgy.

The American bishops rightly wish to engage the culture on a wide range of issues, including the so-called “social issues.” Yet it is only the action of grace, the working of the Holy Spirit, that can ultimately convert hearts, and then minds. Until the Church fully reclaims the Sacred Liturgy and realizes the long-lost desire of the Council to draw the faithful into a deeper spiritual life, with the Liturgy at it center, the New Evangelization will not succeed.

Our shepherds need now to look to the inside in order to be prepared to reach to the outside. Promote honor and reverence for the Blessed Sacrament; the rest will follow.


Damask Rose said...

"Have the changes to the manner in which the Faithful receive the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament assisted the Faithful in their understanding of, and active participation in, the mystery, beauty and essential purposes of the Holy Mass?"

The quote above, your thread title, wraps it up in a nutshell.

As we know, the key words are 'active participation', the baneful misunderstood words that have brought about the ruination of the Mass as we know it.

The laity assumes they have to be doing things during the Mass.

Essentially, what you have now is the destruction of any sense of contemplatio within the universal (NO) Mass structure. In my opinion, fanciful or not, I think it means that the soul, when attending the Mass, in the presence of God, is unable to sing in unison with the angels because of the relentless structure of the 'noisy' Mass. The soul, if you like, is a being created not unlike the angels, and it too wishes to worship its Creator but meets obstacles during the Mass. It needs the quietude but cannot find it. So what happens, is that the soul leaves Mass still hungry for God... which leads to this quote from the text...

"...state of affairs ad intra Eccelsiam. By clearly examining the health of the inner life of the Church, the bishops can lay a better foundation for dealing with the challenges from the outside."

Yes, all very well, but at the moment, the soul is too starving, exhausted and hopeless.

So, of course, ultimately the Liturgy of the Mass has to be looked at again.

Interestingly, I've found that at some 1962 Missal Masses I've attended that when I've prayed for my intentions around the time of the Consecration, before or after, it's as though time has stopped, I've sometimes wondered how I've managed to pray so intensely. Where did I get the time to do it...?

Add to this the disrespectful Communion in the Hand and any such contemplatio or rightful relationship (or worship) with God and His Son is totally destroyed.

This may be extreme, but a corollary is the legend that when God showed Baby Jesus to Satan, he refused to bow down to the Child and yet in parishes you find that people are disrespectful and refuse to show dutiful respect to the Blessed Sacrament.

Sitting in Church before Mass, one might as well be in a pub. Couple of Sunday's ago, I actually moved pews, because I didn't want to hear the holiday escapades of an older couple discussing them with another older couple.

I'm in my mid-40s, and I cannot understand how people, 15-30 years older than me can be so chatty before and after Mass. It's across the board, younger people too, turning around to talk to those behind them, giving a bad example to their young children.

What should I do? Tell them off? And the priests do nothing about it. I only know of one priest in my vicinity who has literally told parishioners to 'shut up'.

Additionally, one would have to prevent the new 'caste' of priests, ie the permanent deacons to stop handing out Communion too as they have encroached on the priesthood in this respect. Priesthood, the Blessed Sacrament and liturgy is a symbiotic relationship. Deacons aren't supposed to preach when the priest is on the Sanctuary, am I right? I won't bother to discuss EMHCs. And there shouldn't be Liturgy Committees. Honest to God, priests need to man-up. But that's the problem isn't it. The priests have gone gay. The Sanctuary has become a feminised place with girl altar servers.

Sorry, but it's all messed up. I have come to believe that Vatican II is merely the vehicle in which the purposeful destruction of the Catholic Church has been wrought. Quoting from VII is useless. Forget it. We haven't even had Vatican II.

The barque's sinking. We need a new ship.

David O'Neill said...

WOW!!! I have to agree with what 'Damask Rose' says in its entirety. The qustion raised in your quotation from the article makes the point very succinctly when it contrasts the present view of the Mass as 'a meal' instead of the absolutely correct 'sacrifice'. If the Mass is a meal then it does not represent what Christ left us which was a sacrifice to recall that He suffered & died for our salvation rather than give us a free trip to the sandwich bar.

The sanctuary has been largely feminised too. It has to be accepted that the priesthood is a male preserve & the fact that males always were the servers ensured that the priesthood was put before the younger males to foster their vocations. However much females want to serve on the altar they should, in most cases, remember that they are possibly preventing a vocation in some boy or young man.

Jacobi said...


The changes in administering Holy Communion have resulted in ignorance of or a near denial of the Real Presence amongst most of our 21st century “Catholics”.

At 50 years since the end of Vat II we can now take stock. The Irish referendum is an important marker.

The calling of Vat II was a mistake. Whatever the documents actually said, the post-Vat II changes, the destruction of 16 centuries of intuitive liturgy, of a universal language, the imposition of an artificial constructed liturgy introducing a “babel “ of languages at a time of unprecedented population movement when a universal language is more vital than ever, the abandonment of RE and Apologetics , the adoption of false ecumenism, I could go on.

Lets say all of this, what could be roughly summed up as the”Spirit of Vat II”, can now be seen to have been an unmitigated disaster for the Catholic Church, as great as and possibly greater than the Arian crisis and the Protestant Reformation.

Catholicism as a result of this error is collapsing. Sorry but I can't think of an a more appropriate word, in Europe and the USA at least.

And Secularism and Islam are advancing.

ps time for my whisky, thank the Lord.

Anonymous said...

Well said Father!