Monday 7 September 2015

Right and wrong Blessed Sacrament Processions

The right sort of Blessed Sacrament Procession!
(Last year at St Anselm's School)
 

I have noticed in one or two places that after Holy Communion there have been introduced quite elaborate rites for cleansing the vessels and returning the Blessed Sacrament to the tabernacle - particularly if the tabernacle is away from the main sanctuary. Sometimes involving processions and candles and, of course, Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion. Obviously, where the tabernacle is at the altar, the opportunity for this creativity doesn't really arise. (Note to self: keep tabernacle where it is!)  It appears that this is a growing practice, as evidenced by the questions sent in to Zenit Liturgy Professor, Legionary of Christ Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy and dean of theology at the Regina Apostolorum University.
 
He says very clearly that the returning of the Blessed Sacrament to the tabernacle after Holy Communion is the wrong sort of Blessed Sacrament Procession.   You can read his straight forward critique of such innovations below.

  
Q: When the consecrated hosts are replaced in the tabernacle after holy communion, are the people are asked to stand up? I ask myself why is this, if I have just received Communion? -- T.Z., Messina, Italy
 
A: There have been several questions regarding this practice recently, above all from Italy, but also from other countries. In some cases our readers described elaborate rites for returning the Eucharist to the tabernacle, even accompanying it with candles as during a Eucharistic procession. In these situations the faithful are requested to remain standing.
 
The reason given for introducing these practices is that it forms part of an effort to restore respect and reverence for the Blessed Sacrament. While this is a laudable goal, I have my doubts that this is the best moment to do so and also it appears contrary to the explicit indications from the Holy See.
First of all, with regard to the posture of the faithful No. 43 of the British translation of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) says the following:
 
"43. The faithful should stand from the beginning of the Entrance chant, or while the priest approaches the altar, until the end of the Collect; for the Alleluia chant before the Gospel; while the Gospel itself is proclaimed; during the Profession of Faith and the Prayer of the Faithful; from the invitation, Orate, fratres (Pray, brethren), before the Prayer over the Offerings until the end of Mass, except at the places indicated below.
 
"They should, however, sit while the readings before the Gospel and the responsorial Psalm are proclaimed and for the Homily and while the Preparation of the Gifts at the Offertory is taking place; and, as circumstances allow, they may sit or kneel while the period of sacred silence after Communion is observed.
 
"But they should kneel at the consecration, except when prevented on occasion by reasons of health, lack of space, the large number of people present, or some other good reason. Those who do not kneel ought to make a profound bow when the priest genuflects after the consecration.
 
"Nevertheless, it is up to the Conference of Bishops to adapt the gestures and postures described in the Order of Mass to the culture and reasonable traditions of the people. The Conference, however, must make sure that such adaptations correspond to the meaning and character of each part of the celebration. Where it is the practice for the people to remain after the Sanctus until the end of the Eucharistic Prayer and before Communion when the priest says Ecce Agnus Dei (This is the Lamb of God), this practice is laudably retained.
 
"With a view to a uniformity in gestures and postures during one and the same celebration, the faithful should follow the directions which the deacon, lay minister, or priest gives according to whatever is indicated in the Missal."
 
Since some interpreted this number as obliging the faithful to remain standing during the whole time of the distribution of communion, the Holy See responded with an answer to a doubt published in its official organ "Notitiae" (39 [2003] page 533):
 
"In many places the faithful are accustomed to remain kneeling in private prayer or to sit after they return to their seats once they have individually received the holy Eucharist at Mass. Whether the provisions of the Third typical edition of the Roman Missal prohibit this practice?
 
"℟. In the negative and with a rationale.
"The rationale is that by the prescripts of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, n. 43 is intended to give, on the one hand, within broad limits some uniformity of posture in the congregation for the various parts of the celebration of the holy Mass, and at the same time, on the other hand, not to regulate posture so rigidly that those who wish to remain kneeling or to sit would no longer be free to do so."
 
Therefore, it does not appear correct to oblige the faithful to adapt a particular posture after communion.
 
Second, the GIRM does not give such importance to returning the Blessed Sacrament to the tabernacle as to warrant an elaborate rite. To wit:
 
"163. When the distribution of Communion is finished, the priest himself immediately and completely consumes at the altar any consecrated Wine that happens to remain; as for any consecrated hosts that are left, he either consumes them at the altar or carries them to the place designated for the reservation of the Eucharist.
 
"Upon returning to the altar, the priest collects any fragments that may remain. Then, standing at the altar or at the credence table, he purifies the paten or ciborium over the chalice, then purifies the chalice, saying quietly: Quod ore sumpsimus (Lord, may I receive), and dries the chalice with a purificator. If the vessels are purified at the altar, they are carried to the credence table by a minister. Nevertheless, it is also permitted, especially if there are several vessels to be purified, to leave them suitably covered on a corporal, either at the altar or at the credence table, and to purify them immediately after Mass following the dismissal of the people."
 
As can be seen, there is nothing here that suggests a specific rite. This is a practical question that is done within the context of the purification. While all due reverence should be observed, there is no need to unduly emphasize this moment.
 
The missal is, however, clear that it should be the priest or deacon, and not an extraordinary minister of holy communion, who should perform this duty in the context of Mass. The priest or deacon should make a genuflection on closing the tabernacle.
I believe that there are several reasons why this is not an apt moment for underlying the Eucharistic presence. First of all, as reflected in the rubrics cited above, this has never been a particularly solemn moment of the celebration. Second, and more importantly, we are still within the context of the celebration of the holy sacrifice of the Mass and the emphasis at this moment is on thanksgiving for having partaken of this sacrifice through holy communion.

4 comments:

Sixupman said...

I automatically kneel before both Sanctus and Agnus Dei, when hearing an NOM. [BTW no one appears to be able to explain the deletion from the third Sanctus of the comma, which I find irritating.] My usurped parish priest [health & safety grounds?] now Celebrates his weekday Mass in a convent chapel, which I find the closeness to him uplifting. At the ablutions, he has discarded the words of the 'New Rite' and utilises the prayers of the 'Old Rite' - which are clearly more representative as to that which has taken place. The care which he undertakes the Ablutions is almost sacramental in itself. At the Sunday Mass, which I now attend elsewhere, Communion and subsequently has been turned into a scrum. The usurped parish priest is allowed to Con-Celebrate, but not give-out Communion to his erstwhile flock - which both he and they find distressing. No to worry, he has a dedicated following or twenty and more for his week-day Masses in the convent. Generally, one can never be sure what is to be faced when attending NOMs at strange churches - that is why I follow clergy I can trust.
.

Sixupman said...

I automatically kneel before both Sanctus and Agnus Dei, when hearing an NOM. [BTW no one appears to be able to explain the deletion from the third Sanctus of the comma, which I find irritating.] My usurped parish priest [health & safety grounds?] now Celebrates his weekday Mass in a convent chapel, which I find the closeness to him uplifting. At the ablutions, he has discarded the words of the 'New Rite' and utilises the prayers of the 'Old Rite' - which are clearly more representative as to that which has taken place. The care which he undertakes the Ablutions is almost sacramental in itself. At the Sunday Mass, which I now attend elsewhere, Communion and subsequently has been turned into a scrum. The usurped parish priest is allowed to Con-Celebrate, but not give-out Communion to his erstwhile flock - which both he and they find distressing. No to worry, he has a dedicated following or twenty and more for his week-day Masses in the convent. Generally, one can never be sure what is to be faced when attending NOMs at strange churches - that is why I follow clergy I can trust.
.

Damask Rose said...

"I have noticed in one or two places that after Holy Communion there have been introduced quite elaborate rites for cleansing the vessels and returning the Blessed Sacrament to the tabernacle - particularly if the tabernacle is away from the main sanctuary. Sometimes involving processions and candles and, of course, Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion."

It's the priest-ifying of the laity, ie. EMHCs. "Priesthood of the laity"... remember that.

The faithful's attention after reception of Communion should be turned to kneeling down and saying a post-Communion prayer of thanksgiving and praying about what they are 'offering' their Communion up for.

Recently, I discovered to my horror that apparently these EMHCs can take Viaticum to the dying. Horrifying. What about the dying person's last confession. God forbid these poor people are making a sacrilegious Communion before their Judgement. But who goes to Confession nowadays? It's as though the Church is wilfully neglecting it's children's souls.

Some of these EMHC's standing on the Sanctuary, all four of them, don't even seem to have their 'Sunday Best' on. Sorry but I'm old fashioned. I find EMHC's returning Communion to the Tabernacles, ie putting their hands in the Tabernacle, most distressing. I'm really struggling with it all. Perhaps I should concentrate on closing my eyes and putting all this into the Lord's hands.

Genty said...

The EMHCs (known as 'special ministers' at my parish and invariably ladies) are tasked with 'purifying' the vessels. They look as though they are gathered round to do the washing-up. Meanwhile, the priest sits doing nothing. I noticed that none of the EMHCs ever genuflect before the tabernacle in the side chapel when reserved Hosts are collected for distribution or the surplus returned. I now close my eyes or look down and try to pray so I don't witness any of this disrespect to Our Lord.
I'll always remember our dismay at my father's Requiem Mass when an elderly male reader stepped up in shell suit and trainers.